Build genuinely diverse UK longlists and shortlists — on evidence. We research the full UK market, benchmark representation against your sector and region, and engage talent from the widest possible pool, so your EDI and gender pay gap commitments turn into hires rather than slideware.
Diverse hiring starts long before the interview — it starts with who makes the longlist.
We research the entire market for a role rather than the usual networks, measure how representation actually looks across it, and engage under-represented talent directly and inclusively. Diverse candidates reach your longlist because the search was genuinely wide — and every profile stands on merit.
Because everything is evidence-based, you can set realistic targets, defend your process, and show measurable progress at every stage from longlist to hire.
Every diversity hiring project includes:
A look at what we hand over — dummy data shown. Use the arrows on either side, swipe, or the arrow keys to browse.
Every candidate is identified and qualified against the role across the full market, and representation is benchmarked against what actually exists — so your process is credible, defensible and fair.
Searching beyond the usual networks surfaces excellent people other processes never reach — lifting the quality of the whole shortlist, not just its diversity.
Representation is reported at longlist, shortlist and offer stage, so you can see exactly where the funnel narrows — and fix it with data rather than guesswork.
Diversity hiring is shaped around your goals and your market. Here are a few of the areas where it makes the biggest difference:
Senior teams are where representation gaps are most visible — and hardest to close through normal channels.
We map the full senior market, benchmark what representation is achievable, and build diverse longlists for leadership and board roles with verified, qualified profiles.
Talk to us about a leadership role →Are your targets ambitious, or simply unrealistic? Without knowing the available market, it’s impossible to say.
We benchmark representation by role, function, sector and geography — so your goals are grounded in evidence and your progress can be judged fairly.
Succession plans built from internal networks tend to reproduce the current picture.
By adding externally researched, diverse succession benches for critical seats, every future transition becomes an opportunity to move representation forward.
Every project is shaped around your goals, but in general this is how we’d work with you:
Agree goals and benchmark the baseline
Map the full market and measure representation
Engage under-represented talent inclusively
Deliver diverse longlists and shortlists
Report representation at every stage
Our clients trust us because our approach is built on research rather than rhetoric. We take the time to understand your goals and your market, then bring you a genuinely wider pool — with the evidence to show it.
Benchmarks and reporting grounded in the real available market — so targets are realistic and progress is provable.
First contact handled by researchers trained in inclusive, bias-aware engagement that candidates respond to.
We research and engage talent across Europe, the Americas, APAC, the Middle East and Africa.
Every profile is qualified against the role — a wider pool and a stronger shortlist, never a compromise.
“We had honest, ambitious representation goals and no idea whether they were achievable. Audentia benchmarked our market, showed us exactly what the pool looked like, and built longlists that were both genuinely diverse and genuinely strong. For the first time our diversity reporting is built on evidence rather than hope.”
Chief People Officer — Global technology client
Internal networks kept producing the same names. Our full-market research doubled female representation on the shortlist — without lowering the bar on a single criterion.
Learn more →Before publishing diversity goals, our client asked us to benchmark the real market. The evidence reshaped their targets — and made the ones they set credible.
Learn more →We built externally researched succession benches for five critical roles, turning each future transition into a measurable step forward on representation.
Learn more →British employers publish gender pay gap figures, report against board diversity targets, and answer to investors, regulators and their own people on representation. What most of them lack is a defensible evidence base: how many women, ethnic minority, disabled and socially mobile candidates genuinely exist at the relevant level in their market, and how their own shortlists compare.
We research the full UK market for a role — not a shortlist of the obvious names — and report representation at every stage, from the mapped population through longlist and shortlist to appointment. Research is designed around the protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010, follows a documented methodology, and produces a benchmark you can put in front of a board, an investor or an employment tribunal without flinching.
Representation in your shortlist compared with the researched population for your role, level, sector and region — so “the market isn’t there” becomes a testable claim rather than an excuse.
Research supports positive action, never positive discrimination. Selection stays on merit; what changes is how wide and how deliberately the market was searched.
Stage-by-stage representation data that feeds directly into gender pay gap narratives, ESG disclosures and board diversity reporting.
Is diversity hiring research lawful in the UK?
Yes, when it is done as positive action rather than positive discrimination. We widen and evidence the search so that under-represented candidates are found and approached; the selection decision itself remains a merit decision made by you, which is exactly what the Equality Act 2010 requires.
Can you benchmark representation for our sector?
Yes. We research the available UK population for the role and level, then report representation across gender, ethnicity and, where candidates disclose it, disability and socio-economic background, so you can see how your pipeline compares with the market that actually exists.
Will this help our gender pay gap reporting?
It gives you the hiring-side evidence. Representation at mapped, longlist, shortlist and appointment stage shows what you did to widen the pool, which is the part of the narrative most UK reports handle weakest.
Do you work to a diverse shortlist commitment?
We work to an evidenced shortlist. If the researched market genuinely cannot support a target, we will say so in writing and show you the numbers rather than quietly padding a list.
A thirty-minute conversation is usually enough to know whether we can help — and what the available market really looks like for your role.